Advised by his personal physician, Jinnah took time out and went to Ziarat in Baluchistan to recuperate. He thought there was nothing serious with him but his optimism did not match with the diagnosis of his doctor who had been called to treat him. As Dr Col. Ilahi Bakhsh later recalled Jinnah was suffering from a lung disease and insinuated unexplained official apathy and neglect towards him. Some years later, Collins and Lappiere dramatically claimed in their Freedom at Midnight that Dr Jal R. Patel, a Bombay Physician, had treated Jinnah earlier in 1946 for tuberculosis but had kept it a secret on the directions of his patient. These assertions stirred considerable controversy though Dr Patel’s earlier statement made to Hector Bolitho, Jinnah’s biographer, contradicts the claim of such a malady. So what is the truth?
The truth is that sometimes before the partition of British India, Jinnah had developed problems with his health owing to the ever-increasing quantum of work, which required him to seek medical advice more often. By December 1946, he was so overwhelmed with work that he had a nervous breakdown from which he did not recover until March 1947. The establishment of Pakistan and the colossal problems that the new State inherited pushed him further nearer to a breakdown. But Jinnah’s clinical record and medical reports preserved at the National Archives of Pakistan and the Cabinet Division in Islamabad have a different story to tell. For instance, an X-ray taken in Bombay in August 1940 shows ‘a fair amount of mottling’ in right upper lobe of the lung but it was all perfectly healed up. There was no mention of any tuberculosis. Five years later, another X-ray taken in Delhi in April 1945 confirms that both lungs were fairly lighted up. There were calcified signs of old pleurisy but no tuberculosis. Two months later in June 1945, another X-ray taken in Bombay reported a much-improved condition. Adhesions had gone and the lung contour had become regular. There was no evidence of pleurisy. The old calcified patches were just the remnants of healed lesions. There were again no signs of tuberculosis. In fact, in summer 1945, Jinnah had been feeling much better than in the recent past. Similarly, the haematological and cytological reports indicated no abnormality in the overall picture. Jinnah’s urine and stools tests also had no pathological abnormality. The electrocardiograph tests conducted in March and June 1945 showed his heart was normal. The X-ray examination of the lumbar spine, however, indicated that he was suffering from a back problem. Overall, however, there was no organic problem.
If this was the state of Jinnah’s health in 1945 then how could he have developed tuberculosis in 1946. Col. Ilahi Bakhsh is certain that he had lung disease but, unfortunately, the crucial medical record for the year 1948 is missing. Without it no conclusive verdict can be delivered except that possibly he was suffering from lung cancer and that is what brought his end so quickly. As to the impact of his health on his decision-making faculty, Jinnah had the will power to carry on undaunted by random illnesses. His mind remained alert until the end and his power of decision never diminished. Perhaps with time he became a little irritable but otherwise he was able to cope with the pressures of work rather well. Thus there seems to be no truth in the generally held assumptions that Jinnah knew he was a dying man and therefore hurriedly accepted the offer of a ‘truncated and moth-eaten’ Pakistan from Mountbatten. In fact ill-health had hardly any consequence on his actions while taking important decisions. Even during his last days in Ziarat and Quetta in summer 1948 official files were sent to him through couriers and riders for his decisions and approval.
M. Naeem Qureshi holds a Ph.D. from the University of London (1973). He has been Professor and Chair of the Department of History at the Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad. He is the author of Pan-Islam in British Indian Politics (Leiden: Brill, 1999; updated edition Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2009). His other book, Ottoman Turkey, Atatürk, and Muslim South Asia: Perspectives, Perceptions and Responses (Oxford University Press, 2014), won the ‘Best Non-Fiction Book of 2014’ prize at the Karachi Literary Festival in February 2015. Presently, he is working on the biography of Jinnah.
You may also like:
Women's Role in the Pakistan Movement
(March 22, 2017)
Book Review: 'The Party Worker' by Omar Shahid Hamid
(March 20, 2017)
'Lahore Will Not Cower Down to Terrorists': Lahore Literary Festival 2017
(February 28, 2017)
Humyra Saiyid: The Passing of a Cultural Icon
(February 21, 2017)
Kashmir's Azadi (Freedom) and the Sinha Committee Report
(February 03, 2017)
Remembering Habib Fida Ali
(January 09, 2017)
The Rise and Rise of the Lahore Literary Festival
(December 30, 2016)
The Vision of the Founding Father: What the Quaid foresaw in 1948
(December 23, 2016)
Pulsating Markers of Our Past: Sufi Shrines in South Punjab and Sindh
(December 11, 2016)
Tahafuz: Making the World Assault-Free, One Workshop at a Time
(November 30, 2016)
Iqbal's Vision of an Egalitarian Society and our Failings
(November 09, 2016)