Bhagat Singh was born in September 28, 1907 in the district of Lyallpur, Punjab. His uncle was the famous revolutionary, Ajit Singh. The 1st World War (for which a large number of soldiers were recruited from the Punjab), and the outbreak of the Russian Revolution in 1917, were the backdrop to his formative years. Bhagat Singh’s visit to the Jallianwala Bagh, a week after the massacre there in April, 1919, must have filled his anti-colonial fervor with a new resolve.
With Europe laid to waste after the death and destruction wrought by the World War, the Russian Revolution offered an alternative ideology to western capitalism and imperialism, especially to the colonized world. Capitalism looked fragile and vulnerable even in Europe: Bela Kun’s soviet, formed at the end of 1918 in Hungary, had survived for a 100 days, while Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebnecht were killed attempting a revolution in Berlin in the same year.
However, the British policies in India remained unresponsive to a changed world. Socialist ideas and talk of liberation had begun to spread to India and China in the 1920s, assisted and propagated by the Communist International, or the Comintern, founded in 1919, to export revolution beyond the frontiers of Russia. It is not surprising that the Chinese Communist Party came into being around this time, when it was officially founded in Shanghai in July, 1921.
When the non-cooperation movement launched by Gandhi in 1920 was suddenly called off in 1922, as a result of the mob burning down the police station at Chauri Chaura, it led to the frustration and radicalization of large sections of nationalists, particularly the youth, and was fertile ground for the spread of socialism and communism.
Bhagat Singh is a product of this milieu: a self-proclaimed atheist, steeped in Marxist and anarchist ideas. He founded the Naujawan Bharat Sabha (Indian Youth Movement) in March 1926, and when he joined the Hindustan Republican Association in 1928, he had its name changed to Hindustan Socialist Republican Association or HSRA. In the government crackdown against the demonstrations that greeted the arrival of the Simon Commission to India, the nationalist Lala Lajpat Rai was killed by baton wielding police. Bhagat Singh, along with two other colleagues, took revenge by shooting dead a police officer by the name of Saunders in Lahore, in December 1928, and escaped. A few months later, Bhagat Singh, accompanied by Dutt, lobbed two bombs in the Central Legislative Assembly, purely for propaganda purposes, and then courted arrest. Bhagat Singh and two of his colleagues were tried by a special tribunal and sentenced to death by hanging, which was carried out on March 23rd 1931. Bhagat Singh was only twenty-three years old at the time.
He was a romantic nationalist who believed in the efficacy of acts of heroic violence, and hoped that his martyrdom would stir Indians to rise against the unjust, autocratic and racist colonial order. His struggle was for a society where there would be economic and social equality. The Ajoka play points out that while Gandhi demanded the release of other prisoners, Bhagat Singh and his colleagues were not part of that list. Gandhi stood on the other end of the political spectrum, for not only was he a fervent believer in non-violence, but also wanted India to revert to a utopian vision of ancient India based on self-sufficient villages; this was a far cry from the model of a modern industrial socialist state to which nationalists of different political hues, as varied as Bhagat Singh, Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose, aspired.
Ajoka’s presentation of Mera Rang De Basanti Chola had less dialogue and more songs; most of these were sung by this group of revolutionaries or by minstrels glorifying the group’s sacrifices for the cause of Indian freedom. While the play mentions that Gandhi had little interest in supporting Bhagat Singh’s cause, it does mention that Quaid-i-Azam, the founder of Pakistan, spoke sympathetically about him. It might have added more intellectual rigour to the play if it had brought out the contradictions in Bhagat Singh’s thought. This group’s hope that their actions would behave as a catalyst in mobilizing more revolutionaries against the colonial state, is more in the anarchist tradition, and in sharp contrast to the Marxist emphasis on class struggle as opposed to individual acts of heroism.
The fact remains that the more revolutionary ideas and methods of ousting the British from India never took root in that country. Gandhi’s genius lay in developing a more tedious but sure way of challenging British control. All revolutionary challenges were rooted out by a very effective intelligence apparatus and harsh punishments; Bhagat Singh and his cohorts were victims of this effective authoritarian system based on legalism.
You may also like:
A Comedy of Errors: LUMS Annual Play 'Tom, Dick and Harry'
(April 25, 2017)
Theatre Review: 'Wash Yourself of Yourself' at the NAPA International Theatre and Music Festival
(March 31, 2017)
'Hash Stags' – From Theatre Stages to Electronic Screens!
(March 15, 2017)
'Sargoshiyan: An Evening of Whispers' at IBA Karachi
(January 31, 2017)
A Night Out with Five Hilarious Females: 'The Auratnaak Show' in Islamabad
(December 26, 2016)
'Bala King': A Political Narrative by Ajoka Theatre at PNCA
(December 16, 2016)
Theatre Review: 'Kabira Khara Bazaar Mein' by Ajoka at PNCA
(December 15, 2016)
Theatre Review: 'Dukh Darya' by Ajoka at PNCA
(December 14, 2016)
The Fringe 2016 - Inter-IBA Drama Competition
(December 8, 2016)
Faiz International Festival Part II
(November 22, 2016)
Faiz International Festival Part I
(November 21, 2016)
Theatre Review: 'Bananistan' by KopyKats Productions
(November 18, 2016)